Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada (Office of the)

FOI subpage guess 404'd; FOI via central portal; no current plan located

Completeness

• Document shelf: 35 rows (35 archived · 0 staged · 0 pending · 0 missing)
• Backgrounder: on file
• Strategy-evolution brief: on file
• Custody audit: 29 of 35 row(s) audited, 1 flagged
• Last verified: 2026-08-06 · this org has had a full discovery-verification pass (our discovery-verification log)

Endpoints

• Website
• Open data: not yet verified
• API: not yet verified
• RSS: not yet verified
• Newsroom: not yet verified
• FOI / access requests: not yet verified

Document shelf (35 rows)

Backgrounder

Source: this library's internal records — a mechanical research draft, not independently reviewed for publication; reproduced as-is.

Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada (Office of the) - backgrounder

Backgrounder / GOV-Q10-WAVE1-d1 / 2026-08-04 / registry row: fed-commissioner-federal-judicial-affairs-canada (this library's government-document registry) / lens file for this org's series briefs

Mandate & statutory basis

The Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs (FJA) was established under the Judges Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. J-1, which defines its authority and responsibilities (FJA Departmental Plan 2024-2025, https://www.fja.gc.ca/publications/dp-pm/2024-2025/dp-pm-2024-2025_eng.html, fetched this review).

Roles, responsibilities & scope

The FJA provides services to approximately 1,200 federally appointed judges and 1,100 pensioners/survivors, including administering judicial appointments and Judicial Advisory Committees, supporting the Supreme Court of Canada appointments process, providing judges' official-language training, publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court decisions, processing judicial compensation, allowances and pension benefits, managing international judicial cooperation initiatives, and supporting the Canadian Judicial Council's conduct-review process (FJA Departmental Plan 2024-2025, https://www.fja.gc.ca/publications/dp-pm/2024-2025/dp-pm-2024-2025_eng.html).

Governance & reporting line

The Commissioner reports within the ministerial portfolio of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (FJA Departmental Plan 2024-2025, https://www.fja.gc.ca/publications/dp-pm/2024-2025/dp-pm-2024-2025_eng.html).

Budget scale

Total planned spending for 2024-25 was $788,800,057, comprising $788,073,257 for core responsibilities and $726,800 for internal services, against a planned complement of 66 full-time equivalents (FJA Departmental Plan 2024-2025, https://www.fja.gc.ca/publications/dp-pm/2024-2025/dp-pm-2024-2025_eng.html). This total is driven overwhelmingly by statutory judicial salaries, allowances and pension payments administered by the FJA on behalf of the federally appointed judiciary rather than by the office's own operating costs - ⚠️ still being checked the FJA's own internal operating budget separate from these statutory pass-through payments, not isolated this review.

Institutional history

The Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs was established in 1978 (FJA Departmental Plan 2024-2025, https://www.fja.gc.ca/publications/dp-pm/2024-2025/dp-pm-2024-2025_eng.html).

Strategy evolution brief

Source: this library's internal records — a mechanical research draft, not independently reviewed for publication; reproduced as-is.

Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada - strategy evolution

2026-08-06 / registry: fed-commissioner-federal-judicial-affairs-canada / grounded in archived copies (cited document id + sha256) / read through our research file for that body / rev1: registry-completion revision (see one of this library's internal records)

TL;DR: The readable record now spans 11 usable documents across a genuine decade-plus (dp-2015 through dp-2025, drr-2017 through drr-2024) — this revision integrates drr-2017, the FY2016-17 results report the v1.0 brief's inventory omitted entirely despite it sitting mid-series. The registry has grown to 35 rows and its true shape has reversed: this is a mostly-recoverable series with a named Mac capture backlog, not the "17 of 29 rows never captured" picture the prior brief drew — 13 rows are staged and pending-capture (URL-verified live 2026-08-06, not gaps), 2 are confirmed stub artifacts, and only 9 (the FY2003-04 through FY2012-13 departmental plans, hosted on the now-decommissioned tbs-sct.gc.ca) are genuinely dead-hosted. Within the readable decade the biggest priority addition is the 2023 Bill C-9 reform of the judicial conduct-review regime (Royal Assent June 22, 2023, first full reporting cycle 2024-25), layered on a 2016 Supreme Court of Canada open, merit-based appointment process — now shown by drr-2017 to have been FJA-supported a year earlier than previously tracked, in its first use for the Rowe appointment — and a Technical Assistance Partnership (TAP) international-cooperation program that grew from a two-country pilot (Colombia, Mongolia) into a formal five-year, Global-Affairs-funded program spanning Moldova, South Africa and Lithuania. The most quietly dropped element is the standalone "Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission" sub-program — a distinct budget line still listed as of drr-2017 (FY2016-17) — folded wordlessly into broader program groupings once the government-wide Core Responsibility model replaced the older Program Alignment Architecture starting dp-2019. The most load-bearing number is 2024-25 planned spending of $788,800,057 (matching the backgrounder) against a 2014-15 baseline of $511,708,846 — growth driven almost entirely by statutory judges' salaries and pensions, not by FJA's own Internal Services budget, which is identically $726,800 in every single document across the decade, drr-2017 included. One open question the record cannot resolve: whether the sharply tabulated decline in FJA's flagship service metric — judges' allowances processed within 10 days, from 83% (2020-21) to a low of 43% (2022-23), recovering only to 80% by 2023-24 against a 90% target — reflects a durable pay-system capacity problem or a transient post-pandemic backlog; the newly staged drr-2019/drr-2020/drr-2022 rows, once captured, would likely narrow this window.

Backgrounder summary

FJA was established in 1978 under the Judges Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. J-1 (re-confirmed, db9d83262882), and provides services to federally appointed judges and their pensioners/survivors, reporting to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada — all as stated in the backgrounder. Total planned spending for 2024-25 of $788,800,057 against 66 planned FTEs is independently re-verified against dp-2025's own tables (db9d83262882; a recorded standing decision: this brief relays the backgrounder's figures and separately re-confirms them against primary text rather than asserting independent discovery). The backgrounder flags one open item — FJA's own internal operating budget separate from the statutory judges' salary/pension pass-through payments it administers. dp-2025's future-oriented financial statement resolves this: of 2024-25 planned total expenses (~$790.1M), $774.0M is judges' salaries/allowances/annuities (statutory), $12.8M is FJA's own personnel/operating costs, and $3.3M is Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) personnel/operating costs (db9d83262882) — FJA's own discretionary operating footprint is roughly $16M of the ~$789M total, under 2%.

Series inventory

_index.json (extraction dir, gse_extract_rev1_2026-08-06): 11 ok / 2 stub-suspected / 0 extract-failed / 11 no-manifest-match (24 rows indexed). Registry (this library's government-document registry, filtered to this registry id): 35 total rows — 22 archived, 13 staged. The two counts differ because 13 registry rows are staged (URL-verified live 2026-08-06, capture pending) and mostly have no extraction-dir entry yet — the exceptions are dp-2016 and dp-2018, which still carry stale no-manifest-match entries in _index.json reflecting their pre-fix dead URLs, superseded by the registry's 2026-08-06 URL-fix to live fja.gc.ca HTML.

Priority evolution

FY2014-15 (dp-2015, 86801fcd0853): Under Minister Peter MacKay and Commissioner William A. Brooks, FJA's four named "Organizational Priorities" were an improved financial control framework (new), improved performance reporting, HR/succession planning (new), and information management. Named international-cooperation projects were country-specific: "Judicial Education for Economic Growth" in Ukraine and "Justice Undertakings for Social Transformation" in Jamaica, both DFATD-funded. Planned spending: $511,708,846 (2014-15), rising to $538,348,975 by 2016-17.

FY2016-17 (dp-2017, 0eacdacd8abb): Priorities carry forward (control framework, succession planning, information management) plus a new fourth priority, "Modernization of FJA processes and tools," a multi-year plan to overhaul JUDICOM and internal web applications. The program itself is renamed "Federal Judicial Affairs" (from "Office of the Commissioner for FJA Canada"). Named country projects from dp-2015 disappear, replaced by generic "DFATD-funded international projects" language. Minister changes to Jody Wilson-Raybould; Commissioner still Brooks. Planned spending: $555,174,253.

FY2016-17 results (drr-2017, 188f57fa62f5 — NEW this revision, omitted from v1.0): Commissioner has already changed to Marc A. Giroux by this report (published 2017-11-09) — one document earlier than the v1.0 brief tracked, which first noticed the change at drr-2018. dp-2017's plan (published under Brooks) and drr-2017's results (signed by Giroux) bracket the transition. The report also shows FJA "given the responsibility of providing support and services to the new and independent Advisory Board" for Supreme Court of Canada appointments already active in FY2016-17 — its first documented use, for the Justice Malcolm Rowe appointment — one year earlier than the v1.0 brief's account, which credited this milestone to drr-2018. On the international file, FJA names continuing work on "Judicial Education for Economic Growth" in Ukraine and reports it "signed an Administrative Arrangement with Global Affairs Canada on a new 5-year judicial reform project" in Ukraine (⚠️ Still being checked: this brief infers this is the same project drr-2018 later names the "Support to Judicial Reform in Ukraine Project," SJRP — both are 5-year, Global Affairs Canada-funded, Ukraine-focused, but drr-2017 does not itself use the SJRP name; see Residuals). FJA served 1,156 judges and 995 pensioners/survivors — an intermediate point between dp-2015's ~1,100 and drr-2018's "more than 1,200." The Canadian Judicial Council's conduct-review secretariat is quantified for the first time in this readable set: 404 pieces of correspondence, 352 opened files, 326 processed and closed, institutionally reported (no complainant or subject judge named). GCDOCS electronic-records migration is reported finalized. Actual spending $546,796,447 (against $555,174,253 planned in dp-2017); actual FTE 63; Internal Services still exactly $726,800; the Program Alignment Architecture still lists "Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission" as sub-program 1.3.5.

FY2017-18 results (drr-2018, eda4125b2e38): Two mandate items land or recur: a second round of Independent Advisory Board support, this one explicitly tied to the vacancy created by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's December 2017 retirement (the Board mechanism itself was not newly formed here — it was already FJA-supported the prior year for the Rowe appointment, per drr-2017 above); and a genuinely new item, support for a new Associate Judges of the Federal Court appointment process. FJA reports serving "more than 1,200" judges for the first time (up from 1,156 in drr-2017). Actual spending $568,449,931; actual FTE 64.

FY2018-19 (dp-2019, 5d7a5db4c868): First document under the government-wide "Core Responsibility" reporting model (replacing Program Alignment Architecture), naming "Administrative support to federally appointed judges" as FJA's single core responsibility. Named priorities: the August 2016 SCC open-appointment-process reform (dating the mechanism drr-2017 shows already active); a bilingual-capacity assessment tool for judicial candidates; proactive expense disclosure ahead of Bill C-58; and — first appearance in the series — Bill C-337, the "Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act," a private member's bill that would require judges and candidates to complete sexual-assault-law education. First explicit diversity/merit framing tied to appointments ("gender parity," Indigenous/minority representation). New Commissioner Marc A. Giroux confirmed continuing (replacing Brooks, transition dated to FY2016-17 per drr-2017 above). One indirect Ontario mention: an MOU with the Superior Court of Ontario for vetting visiting international delegations.

FY2019-20 (dp-2020, 6a9b3ac9e14b): Core Responsibility formally renamed "Support to federally appointed judges" (from "Administrative support to..."), explicitly justified as better reflecting the office's wider mandate. All 17 Judicial Advisory Committees due to turn over in 2019 as members' terms expire. Minister changes to David Lametti.

FY2020-21 plan (dp-2021, 8df8f52e1eac) and results (drr-2021, 6fdf8a4aca54): The plan (written before pandemic operational impact) names Bill C-58 compliance (quarterly judges'-expense publication from July 30, 2020) and full deployment of the bilingual-capacity assessment tool. The results report is the series' COVID document: FJA "leveraged technology to work remotely," began a cloud migration ("the journey to a Cloud platform was initiated"), ran virtual Judicial Advisory Committee meetings and a virtual language-immersion session in January 2021 after cancelling in-person sessions, and the CJC Chairperson co-chaired an "Action Committee on Court Operations in response to COVID-19" with the Minister of Justice. Actual spending came in $28.5M under plan ($626.4M vs $654.9M), attributed to collapsed travel/conference costs. A new SCC appointment process launched February 19, 2021 to replace the retiring Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella.

FY2022-23 results (drr-2023, 5044afd74921): Explicit "post-pandemic recovery" framing and a new hybrid-work strategy. The judges'-allowance 10-day service standard collapses to 43% (from 76% the prior year, against a 90% target), attributed to claim-volume growth amid "dual digital and paper environments." TAP is named for the first time as a pilot, in Colombia and Mongolia. CJC begins preparing for Bill C-9. The JUDICOM-to-JUDICLOUD cloud-platform transition is prioritized. Minister changes to Arif Virani. Actual spending $712,161,752.

FY2023-24 results (drr-2024, 0d0ffb14b631): Bill C-9 receives Royal Assent (June 22, 2023), reforming the judicial conduct-review regime; the year is explicitly described as "transitional," with old- and new-regime complaint files running in parallel and six-month-closure statistics unavailable for comparison. TAP formalizes into a five-year program (Moldova 2022-25, Mongolia 2021-24, South Africa 2023-24 all named), with Mongolia's engagement credited with producing "the first ever Mongolian Ethics Guide for Judges" (bounded to this document; no later document revisits the claim). JUDICLOUD's pilot launches fall 2023 and officially goes live March 2024. The 10-day allowance-processing metric recovers to 80% despite 4,000 more claims than the prior year. Actual spending $751,993,164 — a $40.4M year-over-year jump, the largest single-year increase in the series.

FY2024-25 (dp-2025, db9d83262882): Bill C-9's first full statutory reporting period. Named priorities: implementing the new conduct regime; migrating legacy systems to the cloud; expanding TAP (Lithuania named as a 2024 visit); and workplace training/inclusion. A new self-identification form is introduced covering gender, 2SLGBTQIA+, disability, and racial/ethnic-origin categories, alongside a 5% mandatory minimum Indigenous-procurement target. Planned spending $788,800,057; planned FTE 66 (unchanged since 2014-15).

Priorities added, dropped, renamed

• Added — Bill C-9 judicial conduct regime reform (Royal Assent June 22, 2023): absent from every earlier document; first raised as upcoming in drr-2023 (5044afd74921), implemented mid-FY2023-24 (drr-2024, 0d0ffb14b631), first full reporting cycle FY2024-25 (dp-2025, db9d83262882).
• Added — Supreme Court of Canada open, merit-based appointment process (Aug 2016 reform): absent from dp-2015; first evidenced as an active, FJA-supported function in drr-2017 (188f57fa62f5, FY2016-17 results, the Rowe appointment round) — one document earlier than the v1.0 brief's account, which credited this first to drr-2018; formally dated to the August 2016 reform in dp-2019 (5d7a5db4c868); administered repeatedly through the series (Rowe 2016 per drr-2017; the McLachlin-retirement vacancy round 2017-18, filled by Justice Sheilah Martin, per drr-2018/dp-2019; O'Bonsawin 2022; Moreau process 2023-24 per drr-2024).
• Added — Technical Assistance Partnership (TAP): absent from dp-2015's country-specific Ukraine/Jamaica projects; first named as a pilot in drr-2023 (Colombia, Mongolia, 5044afd74921), a formal five-year program by drr-2024/dp-2025 (Moldova, Mongolia, South Africa, Lithuania).
• Added — Bill C-58 proactive expense-disclosure regime: not present in dp-2015; first implemented July 30, 2020 per dp-2021/drr-2021 (8df8f52e1eac; 6fdf8a4aca54).
• Added — Associate Judges of the Federal Court appointment process: new FJA mandate item, first appearing drr-2018 (eda4125b2e38) — confirmed absent from drr-2017 (188f57fa62f5), the prior year.
• Added — diversity/inclusion apparatus (GBA+, self-identification forms, Rights and Diversity training modules, 5% Indigenous-procurement target): entirely absent from dp-2015; builds incrementally from dp-2019's merit/diversity framing (5d7a5db4c868) to dp-2025's formal self-ID form and procurement target (db9d83262882).
• Quietly dropped — the standalone "Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission" sub-program, a distinct ~$40,000-$48,621/year budget line in dp-2015/dp-2017 (86801fcd0853; 0eacdacd8abb), still listed as sub-program 1.3.5 in drr-2017's Program Alignment Architecture (188f57fa62f5), not carried forward as a separate reporting item once the Core Responsibility model replaces the PAA from dp-2019 onward — folded into broader groupings with no stated reason.
• Quietly dropped/replaced — named country-specific international projects: dp-2015's Ukraine (JEEG) and Jamaica (JUST) projects (86801fcd0853) are gone by dp-2017's generic DFATD language (0eacdacd8abb), though drr-2017 shows both were in fact still active that year alongside a newly signed 5-year Global Affairs Canada Ukraine project (188f57fa62f5); a distinct "Support to Judicial Reform in Ukraine Project" (SJRP) is named explicitly in drr-2018 (eda4125b2e38), but Ukraine is not named again in any later document in this set — see Residuals.
• Renamed — Core Responsibility: "Administrative support to federally appointed judges" (dp-2019, 5d7a5db4c868) → "Support to federally appointed judges" (dp-2020 onward, 6a9b3ac9e14b), explicit rationale given: "better reflects the wider scope of the Office's mandate."
• Renamed — Program: "Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada" (Program 1.3 in dp-2015) → "Federal Judicial Affairs" (dp-2017 onward, 0eacdacd8abb) — same scope, relabeled.

Budget & mandate inflection points

• 2024-25 planned spending $788,800,057 vs 2014-15 planned spending $511,708,846 (db9d83262882; 86801fcd0853) — a ~54% decade-long rise, repeatedly attributed across every document in the set to statutory judges'-salary indexation (the Industrial Aggregate) and a growing pensioner population, not to FJA's own operating costs. FY2016-17 actual spending of $546,796,447 (drr-2017, 188f57fa62f5) sits early in this rise, already above the FY2014-15 planned baseline.
• Internal Services budget: exactly $726,800 in every single document from dp-2015 through dp-2025, drr-2017 included (86801fcd0853 through db9d83262882; confirmed again in 188f57fa62f5) — an unbroken decade-long flat line, never once adjusted.
• Bill C-9 (Royal Assent June 22, 2023) — the series' clearest statutory inflection point, reforming judicial conduct review; drr-2024 explicitly frames FY2023-24 as transitional, with pre- and post-Bill-C-9 complaint regimes running in parallel (0d0ffb14b631).
• COVID-19 (drr-2021, 6fdf8a4aca54) — $28.5M underspend against plan, cloud-migration initiation, and a joint FJA/CJC/Minister of Justice pandemic court-operations task force.
• Service-standard decline and partial recovery: judges'-allowance 10-day processing standard 83% (2020-21) → 76% (2021-22) → 43% (2022-23, drr-2023) → 80% (2023-24, drr-2024), against a 90% target throughout — the sharpest tabulated performance swing in the record.
• Total FTE stable at 66 planned across the entire 2014-15 to 2026-27 span (86801fcd0853 through db9d83262882) even as spending grew by more than half; FY2016-17 actual FTE was 63 (drr-2017, 188f57fa62f5), FY2017-18 actual 64 (drr-2018) — both slightly under the 66 planned figure.

Ontario/Toronto relevance

FJA is a national, Ottawa-based federal body administering payments and services to judges across Canada; the readable record shows no Toronto- or GTA-specific programming, office, or initiative. The one recurring, indirect mention is an institutional MOU between FJA's International Programs Division and the Superior Court of Ontario for protocol liaison support to visiting international judicial delegations, appearing as early as drr-2017 (FY2016-17, 188f57fa62f5 — where FJA credits the MOU with vetting visiting delegations from Mongolia, Latvia and China) and recurring in dp-2019, dp-2020, and drr-2018 (5d7a5db4c868; 6a9b3ac9e14b; eda4125b2e38) — an Ontario-institution reference, not a Toronto-specific program or presence.

Residuals & gaps

• Corrections from v1.0 (this revision). (1) drr-2017 (FY2016-17 results) was omitted from the v1.0 inventory entirely, despite sitting mid-series between dp-2017 and drr-2018; it is now read in full and integrated above. (2) v1.0 credited the Commissioner's change from Brooks to Giroux, and the first FJA-supported round of the SCC Independent Advisory Board, to drr-2018 (FY2017-18) — both are now shown by drr-2017 to have already been true one year earlier, in FY2016-17. (3) v1.0's framing "17 of 29 rows never captured" is corrected below.
• Detector calls confirmed correct on both stub-suspected documents. dp-1999 (0b9d7b4a86f5) is a bare Government of Canada Publications catalogue/metadata record pointing to a never-captured PDF; dp-2014 (7592239f6c91) is a bilingual LAC/publications.gc.ca "Information Archived on the Web" interstitial. Both were read in full and contain zero report content, matching the detector exactly. drr-2017 (188f57fa62f5), the one newly extracted document this revision, is correctly flagged "ok" and reads as full report content (44,266 chars) — no disagreement found in either direction.
• The registry's true shape is a mostly-recoverable series with a named Mac capture backlog, not a series with permanent gaps. Of the 35 registry rows: 11 are read and usable (dp-2015/2017/2019/2020/2021/2025, drr-2017/2018/2021/2023/2024); 2 are confirmed stub artifacts (dp-1999, dp-2014, above); 13 are staged, pending-capture — URL-verified live on 2026-08-06 but not yet captured into this archive (dp-2016, dp-2018, dp-2022, dp-2023, dp-2024, drr-2012 through drr-2016, drr-2019, drr-2020, drr-2022); and only 9 rows are genuinely dead-hosted — the FY2003-04 through FY2012-13 departmental-plan series (dp-2004, dp-2005, dp-2007, dp-2008, dp-2009, dp-2010, dp-2011, dp-2012, dp-2013), whose original host (tbs-sct.gc.ca) was decommissioned and which now survive only as unretrieved Wayback-wrapper URLs. None of the 13 staged rows should be read as unrecoverable or as evidence no document exists — every one was URL-verified live this review; capture is a pending operational task. Once captured, the results-report series alone would run near-continuously from FY2011-12 (drr-2012) through FY2023-24 (drr-2024), a 13-year span — a materially different picture than the v1.0 brief's fragmented account.
• The 2022 gap coincides with the Russia-Ukraine war, though this revision narrows the timeline. drr-2017 (FY2016-17, newly integrated) shows FJA signing a new 5-year Global Affairs Canada judicial-reform arrangement in Ukraine that drr-2018 (FY2017-18) appears to name the "Support to Judicial Reform in Ukraine Project" (SJRP) (⚠️ Still being checked: inferred from matching 5-year duration, Global Affairs Canada funding, and Ukraine focus — drr-2017 does not itself use the SJRP name). A project signed circa FY2016-17 with a 5-year term would nominally run to roughly FY2021-22, meaning it may simply have concluded on schedule rather than being cut short by the February 2022 invasion. Every document from dp-2022 through drr-2022 is staged/pending-capture per this revision (not permanently gapped), so whether FJA's Ukraine engagement was renewed, wound down on schedule, or paused because of the war still cannot be determined from the currently-readable record — capturing drr-2022 (staged) should resolve this directly. TAP's country roster (Colombia, Mongolia, Moldova, South Africa, Lithuania per drr-2023/drr-2024) does not include Ukraine.
• ⚠️ Still being checked: whether Bill C-337 ("Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act"), raised as pending private-member's legislation in dp-2019 (5d7a5db4c868), was ultimately enacted and implemented — no later readable document in this set mentions it again; the staged dp-2022/dp-2023/dp-2024 rows, once captured, could plausibly show its implementation without this revision's readable set showing it.
• ⚠️ Still being checked: the specific cause of the 10-day allowance-processing service standard's collapse to 43% in FY2022-23 — drr-2023 cites rising claim volume and a "dual digital and paper environment" but does not fully explain the magnitude of the drop, and the Regional Pay System (administered by PSPC, outside FJA's direct control) is separately flagged as a support-limited risk in the same document (5044afd74921).
• No private-individual case/complaint content was found in any of the 11 usable documents — conduct-review volumes (drr-2017, drr-2018, drr-2021, drr-2023, drr-2024) are reported only institutionally (correspondence/file counts, percentages, regime mechanics), consistent with the guardrail; no complainant or subject judge is named anywhere in this set. Named individuals appearing are exclusively public officeholders (Ministers, Commissioners, Supreme Court appointees, a retiring Chief Justice) in non-complaint contexts.