Ward 19 — Beaches-East York

Start here. The quickest ways into this page:

Reading this in real time: every registrant figure below — who’s filed, incumbency, candidate counts — is a snapshot as of 2026-08-14, from the City Clerk’s candidate feeds. Nominations close Friday, August 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. — this page re-pulls and re-stamps every registrant figure after that date. Geography, transit, development and census figures are structural facts that don’t move at nomination close and are dated separately, section by section.

Beaches-East York runs along the lake in Toronto's east end — the Beach(es) neighbourhood, Upper Beaches/East End-Danforth, Woodbine Corridor, East Danforth, and part of Old East York. It's a lower-rise, largely residential ward with a historic Carnegie library on Kew Gardens, a subway line along its northern edge, and a GO station midway through a multi-year relocation and rebuild.

A federal by-election is happening here first — Monday, August 31, 2026. This is separate from the Ward 19 council race below: different office (Member of Parliament, not city councillor), different boundary (the federal riding of Beaches–East York, not the city ward), different ballot, different day. Six candidates are on the final ballot; the list closed August 12, 2026 and was re-confirmed directly against Elections Canada on 2026-08-15.

The Aug 31, 2026 federal by-election here

Nate Erskine-Smith, the Liberal MP who held the seat since 2015, resigned effective July 7, 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney called the by-election for Monday, August 31, 2026. This is a federal race — the office is Member of Parliament for Beaches–East York, not a city council seat, and it runs on Elections Canada’s rules, not the City of Toronto’s.

The riding is not the ward. The federal riding of Beaches–East York (electoral district 35007) and the City of Toronto’s Ward 19 “Beaches-East York” share the same cardinal boundary streets in their public descriptions — Coxwell Avenue (west), Sunrise Avenue/the Don River (north), Victoria Park Avenue (east), Lake Ontario (south) — but they are legally distinct boundaries, not the same map. One candidate’s own published release states plainly that riding-level figures “closely align with, though [are] not identical to,” the ward. If you want to confirm which federal riding your address is in before voting, use Elections Canada’s own lookup at elections.ca — Voter Information Service rather than assuming your ward and your riding match.

Key dates

The candidates (6, final — alphabetical by surname, identical fields)

CandidatePartyWebsite
Shannon DevineNew Democratic Partyshannondevine.ca
Michel LachancePeople’s Party of Canadapeoplespartyofcanada.ca/candidate/michel-lachance
Bruce LiveseyGreen Party of Canadano campaign website on file
Tanveer ShahnawazLiberal Party of Canadatanveer.liberal.ca
Jim SyrbosConservative Party of Canadano campaign website on file
Cameron ThomasCanadian Future Partythecanadianfutureparty.ca — Cameron Thomas

Source: Elections Canada confirmed candidates list (issued Aug 12, 2026; websites as listed by Elections Canada), re-fetched live 2026-08-15 — identical to the Aug 12 list. “No campaign website on file” means Elections Canada’s own listing carries none and this project found none independently — a fact about the public record, not a judgment about the candidate.

Registering & voting

Sources: Elections Canada — confirmed candidates list (issued 2026-08-12, re-verified 2026-08-15) · Ways to vote (re-verified 2026-08-15) · ID to Vote (re-verified 2026-08-15). All accessed 2026-08-15 unless noted.

Both by-elections, side by side, with official candidate links and every way to vote: our combined by-election landing page.

Every election event in this ward — the all-candidates debates, every way-to-vote date, and the festivals and markets where the ward gathers — on one calendar with a map: Ward 19 election events.

This page is also the full profile of the riding. Below the council race you will find how Beaches—East York actually participates (the real 72.16% turnout, the half of it cast before election day, and the 47.6-point spread inside one riding), what changed since 2021 and the correction we had to publish, who lives here against how they vote, where the riding has nobody at all, how word travels here, what neighbours report to the City, what is proposed on this land, and exactly how every figure was derived — starting, directly under the council race, with six data stories and an interactive atlas. Jump to participation, who lives here, or how we know this.

The race & the 2022 baseline

2022 result: Brad Bradford won by 32.0 percentage points over the runner-up — a landslide, not a close call. Source: City of Toronto official 2022 election results, as_of 2026-08-16.

This ward’s own 2022 turnout was 36.40% (28,315 of 77,782 eligible electors cast a ballot) — compared to a citywide 2022 turnout of 29.7% that year. Source: City of Toronto, City Clerk’s Office, “Elections – Voter Statistics” (2022 dataset), cross-checked against the Clerk’s own 2022 Municipal Election Report.

Who’s running here in 2026 (10)

Every candidate filed in this ward as of 2026-08-16, alphabetical by surname, identical fields for every name. Bios are synthesized only from each candidate’s own published campaign material and registry facts — never from news coverage, opposition material, or this project’s own judgment (see Receipts below).

Jaana Syeda Ali

Registered 2026-06-30 · Website: https://jaanasyedaali.ca/

Jaana Syeda Ali (published on her campaign site as Syeda Jaana Ali) is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on June 30, 2026. Her campaign site, under the banner "Together for a Stronger Beaches-East York," lists five commitments: safer streets and reliable transportation, including safer intersections and reduced speeding; responsible growth and affordable housing that respects neighbourhood character; clean parks and resilient infrastructure; support for local businesses and community services; and accessible, accountable leadership with regular engagement and timely responses. Her site describes more than 15 years of executive leadership and commercial-strategy experience and notes she is a regular volunteer with the Fort York Food Bank.

James Dann

Registered 2026-05-01 · Website: https://jamesdann.ca/

James Dann is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 1, 2026. His campaign site describes 25 years working for the City of Toronto managing parks, waterfront, and infrastructure, including projects in the Beaches and East York such as restoring the Leuty Lifeguard Station and Kew Gardens Bandshell. His platform is organized under four headings: "Move Quicker," covering transit reliability and protecting existing bike lanes; "Grow Smarter," covering infrastructure to match growth, affordable and community housing, and a proposed moratorium on new AI data centres pending rules and consultation; "Live Better," covering year-round accessible park washrooms and pairing encampment enforcement with housing offers; and "Go Greener," covering protection of green space and urban tree cover.

Natalie Johnson

Registered 2026-05-11 · Website: https://votenataliejohnson.ca/

Natalie Johnson is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 11, 2026. Her current site returns no body text on a plain fetch (confirmed client-rendered as of 2026-08-14), so this bio is based on a 2026-08-06 capture. That capture described her as a former CTV News journalist who spent 16 years covering Toronto City Hall, a Beaches-East York resident and mother of three, and a board member of Community Centre 55 and the Beaches Sandbox. Her stated priorities included capital infrastructure and transit improvements to ease traffic, safe parks and reliable city services, and what she described as reasonable, responsive representation open to good ideas regardless of source.

Tycen Legg

Registered 2026-05-01 · Website: https://www.tycenlegg.ca

Tycen Legg is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 1, 2026. His campaign site publishes a policy platform across several categories. On transit, he lists eliminating TTC slow zones, streetcar and bus priority lanes, expanded Bike Share, and safer intersections near schools. On housing, he lists streamlined approvals and legalizing laneway, garden, and basement suites. On local business, he lists simplified patio permitting and a surcharge on empty storefronts. On parks and environment, he lists community safety audits and expanded urban forestry grants. On governance, he lists a living wage for city employees and support for Toronto becoming a Charter City. A separate "Commitments" section describes plans for regular public office hours and town halls.

Kevin Morrison

Registered 2026-05-05 · Website: https://electkevinmorrison.com/

Kevin Morrison is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 5, 2026. His campaign site describes him as a school board trustee with more than 25 years of community service and 30 years living in Beaches-East York, and states he received a 2023 Queen's Jubilee Award. His platform, published as "Kevin's To-Do List," includes opposing expansion of the Billy Bishop airport, accessible snow removal, more frequent bus and streetcar service, a new school at Main and Danforth, investing in supportive housing, requiring community benefits from developers, and expanding childcare availability, citing his record creating childcare spaces as a trustee.

Adam Smith

Registered 2026-05-01 · Website: https://www.adamsmithward19.ca

Adam Smith is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 1, 2026. His campaign site describes 16 years of community involvement, including work with the Beach Community Edible Garden, Meals on Wheels, and advocacy against overdevelopment before the former Ontario Municipal Board. His platform, described on the site as an update of platforms he ran on in 2018 and 2022, is organized into four pillars: "A Livable Planet" (emissions, waste, and green space); "A Circular Economy" (local food security and small-business support); "An Equitable Society" (housing as a human right, youth, seniors, and public services); and a "Ward 19 Transportation Network" plan, including completing the Woodbine bike lanes and opposing expansion of the Billy Bishop airport.

Austin Vieira

Registered 2026-05-07 · Website: https://austinvieira.com

Austin Vieira is a candidate for Toronto City Council, Ward 19 Beaches-East York, in the 2026 municipal election, registered on May 7, 2026. A campaign website exists at austinvieira.com; its contents could not be captured for this profile as of August 14, 2026.

Jeff Wahl

Registered 2026-05-08 · Website: no campaign website on file

Jeff Wahl is a candidate for Toronto City Council, Ward 19 Beaches-East York, in the 2026 municipal election, registered on May 8, 2026. As of August 14, 2026, no campaign website had been located; an Instagram account is on file for the campaign, but its posts were not available to this synthesis from local records.

Devin Wilkins

Registered 2026-06-09 · Website: https://www.votedevinwilkins.ca

Devin Wilkins is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on June 9, 2026. His campaign site, under the tagline "Bottom of the Ballot, First for Beaches-East York," describes his family immigrating from Alabama 13 years ago and three years organizing community events including the Beaches Jazz Festival, Beaches Easter Parade, Canada Day Picnic, and Pape Village Block Party. His platform lists three priorities: "Moving Better," including expanded dedicated bus and streetcar lanes and a continuous east-west cycling corridor; "Growing Together," including rezoning for medium-density housing, stronger tenant protections, and rent control on residential properties; and "Thriving Communities," including improved walkability, park upgrades, and support for neighbourhood retail.

Jennie Worden

Registered 2026-05-21 · Website: https://www.jennieworden.ca

Jennie Worden is a candidate for Ward 19 Beaches-East York, registered on May 21, 2026, and previously ran in this ward in 2022. Her campaign site describes her as a Communications and Program Manager at the Canadian Journalism Foundation and a former five-year Executive Director of Orchestra Toronto, and notes she is a founding member of East Enders Against Racism and a member of Toronto ACORN, a tenant-advocacy group. Her platform includes accessible, responsive representation through rotating office hours and casework support; connected, safe, and affordable communities, including streetcar revitalization and protections against renoviction; and public-space maintenance and community engagement on development, including keeping beaches and ravines clean and accessible.

Absence of a website, a bio, or any campaign material on this page is a fact about the public record and this project’s search on 2026-08-14 — not a judgment about any candidate’s effort, seriousness, or worth. Every candidate below gets the identical fields, the identical format, and the identical treatment, alphabetically by surname, whether incumbent or first-time, well-resourced or not.

The riding, in data — six stories and an atlas

All of the above, and a good deal more, is published as a set of standalone data stories with an interactive atlas behind them — built entirely from Elections Canada’s own returns, the 2021 census and the City’s open map layers. Every figure on every one of them carries its source, its date, alt text and a download of the exact data behind it. No candidate, no party and no individual appears anywhere in the set.

The community, in data

The front door to all six stories and the atlas — every figure with its source, its date, alt text and a download of the exact data behind it.

Two worlds, one street

The flagship scrollytelling piece — fly the participation canyon from the boardwalk to the towers in about ninety seconds.

The canyon didn’t close

Five figures, one claim each: the trend, the advance zones, tenure, advance voting, and the towers.

The tower explorer

Every single-building poll in both ridings, ranked and filterable, each joined to its nearest partner institutions.

Why pods beat blankets

The coverage arithmetic, drawn: what it would take to cover the whole riding against what it takes to cover the gap.

Who reaches whom

The riding’s three information ecosystems as one matrix — and the population no local channel reaches at all.

The same canyon: Scarborough Southwest

The neighbouring by-election riding’s mirror geography, drawn at the same grain, with its federal-layer substitution stated on every figure.

The community atlas

The data-app microsite binding the stories together, with every dataset behind them downloadable.

The whole package works offline and holds no tracker, no API key and no third-party map tile service. Published 2026-08-16; figures corrected the same day (see the correction above).

The numbers behind every one of them are set out in full further down this page: how the riding participates, who lives here, and how we know it.

Geography & boundaries

Legally defined (Elections Ontario boundary text, reproduced on Wikipedia): starts at Victoria Park Ave. & Sunrise Ave., west along Sunrise to the Don River East Branch, along that branch to Taylor Creek, east along the creek to Coxwell Blvd., south on Coxwell to Lake Shore Blvd. E., then a line to Ashbridge's Bay, south along the bay, due south to the city's southern limit (the lake), northeast along that limit, then north on Victoria Park Ave. back to the start. In plain terms: Lake Ontario to the south, Coxwell Avenue on the west, Sunrise Avenue to the north, Victoria Park Avenue on the east. Community council: Toronto and East York. Named neighbourhoods/areas: Upper Beaches (city's "East End-Danforth," with the Woodbine Avenue-to-Coxwell portion called "Woodbine Corridor"), East Danforth (Danforth Village), Old East York. [Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_19_Beaches%E2%80%94East_York, accessed 2026-08-14] [Source: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/8c9d-CityPlanning-Map-Ward-19.pdf (City of Toronto ward map), accessed 2026-08-14]

Civic texture — what’s live here

Transit & development

Subway: TTC Line 2 (Bloor-Danforth) runs along/near the ward's northern edge; Main Street Station sits just north of Danforth Avenue in the ward's western section (exact station-to-ward assignment not independently verified against the boundary polygon). GO: the Lakeshore East line's Danforth GO station is mid-relocation/rebuild (§3), tied to the broader Lakeshore East expansion. Development: current live activity skews toward transit-adjacent infrastructure (Danforth GO, MTSA zoning) and basement-flooding/watermain capital works rather than a single large private redevelopment site, per the City's own construction-notice page.

Local commons

Toronto Public Library branches and Parks, Forestry & Recreation community/recreation centres located inside this ward’s boundary, joined by geographic coordinates (see Receipts) — complete citywide datasets for both layers, every ward covered.

Public libraries (4)

Community & recreation centres (18)

Parks aren’t listed here: parks joining is partial citywide — not shown rather than shown unevenly. The citywide parks join has fetched and joined 400 of the dataset’s 1,511 Park-type rows so far; that 400-row sample isn’t evenly distributed enough per ward to publish per-ward park lists or counts responsibly yet.

Local media landscape

Networks & local commons

As of August 17, 2026, this project's public organization registry maps 155 organizations directly to Ward 19 (Beaches-East York) — corrected the same day from the 54 this brief first stated, by a registry-wide fix to the tag-format-fragmentation bug named below: the public ward pages had been reading only the single canonical `"Ward 19 (Beaches-East York)"` tag spelling and silently missing every alternate format the registry's own geography join (`org_placements.csv`) already resolves. Of the 54, 18 were from earlier passes, plus 36 new from the ward sweep program's first wave, which took the deeper by-election-era area sweep below and individually re-checked each organization's own address against the actual Ward 19 council boundary (a boundary that is not identical to the Beaches-East York federal riding those rows were originally collected under). The remaining 101 organizations behind today's 155 total are principally bulk City/CRA register rows (early-years childcare, K-12 parent councils, arts-culture) whose tag format the sweep's own count did not yet recognize; 28 of the 155 carry `verified-live` status, the rest `seed-web-verified`.

*(One EarlyON centre's name is spelled "O'Connor EarlyON Child and Famiy Centre" in the City's own dataset, faithful to source; it is written correctly above rather than reproducing the City's typo in reader-facing prose.)*

The 36 rows confirmed inside the ward boundary, spanning categories the earlier count did not yet reach: Beach United Church (faith, https://beachunitedchurch.com/), St. Saviour's Anglican Church (faith), Beach Triangle Residents Association, Greater Beach Residents Association, Beach Lakefront Neighbourhood Association and Balmy Beach Residents' Association (four further residents' associations, alongside DECA above), Goodwood Park Tenants Union and Park Vista Tenants' Association (tenant groups), Main-Gerrard Housing Co-operative and Naismith Co-operative (housing co-ops), Malvern Collegiate Institute and East York Collegiate Institute (TDSB secondary schools), Friends of Small's Creek Ravines (ravine stewardship), East Lynn Park Farmers' Market (https://www.eastlynnparkfarmersmarket.ca/), Beach Celtic Festival and Toronto Beaches Lions Easter Parade (festivals), Fox Theatre (arts), Ted Reeve Hockey Association and East York Baseball Association (youth sport), Beaches Sandbox (https://beachessandbox.com/, a community-partner venue and hub), True Davidson Acres and Main Street Terrace (City long-term-care homes), Beach Garden Society and Stan Wadlow Park Community Garden (food-growing), Toronto Beaches Runners Club, Kew Gardens Tennis Club and Kew Beach Lawn Bowling Club (membership sport clubs), and Pui Hong Chinese Seniors' Program (ethnocultural seniors' programming, run through TNG Neighbourhood Link).

Not every row from the deeper area sweep cleared. A handful of names that were also already on file under slightly different spellings or with a different parenthetical are held pending an address-level check rather than added twice; four rows tied to the by-election itself (a sitting councillor's and MPP's constituency offices, an elections office, and the by-election event itself) were kept out of this civic registry on the same nonpartisan-neutrality rule that keeps riding associations and candidate campaigns out of it everywhere in this project. Separately, the by-election sweep's 48-row list of online-only groups (Facebook pages, newsletters, podcasts) could not be checked against a street address the way the in-person rows were, so it is not yet folded in — a different method than a boundary check is needed there.

This brief's Local Commons section above already names Ward 19's civic-infrastructure anchors; those, plus the organizations above, are the backbone the city-wide network map builds outward from.

These verified rows are a strong start, not a finished map. City-wide organization mapping is underway ward by ward. If you lead, work with, or simply know of an organization rooted in this ward, this project's tribes directory at https://unitetolove.ca/tribes/directory.html is where to add it or correct what's already there — every addition is checked against a public source before it's published.

The ward in numbers (2021 Census)

Source: City of Toronto Ward Profiles (25-Ward Model), Statistics Canada 2021 Census custom tabulations, City Planning Division, published December 2023. Household income reflects the 2020 reference year.

Population108,500
Median age41.2
Median household income (2020)$89,000
Renter / owner household split44.2% / 55.8%
Top home languages (excl. English/French)Bengali (2,295), Yue (Cantonese) (1,300), Spanish (950)
Land area16.8 km²

See the citywide summary table for the same census columns, all 25 wards, one page.

How Beaches—East York actually participates

Turnout, and only turnout. Everything in this half of the page is the share of registered electors who cast a ballot — the one figure in an election-results file that carries no partisan information at all. It says who showed up; it never says who anyone voted for. Elections Canada publishes poll-level results by candidate; this project committed to publishing participation only, never a vote for anyone, and no party’s vote is mapped anywhere on this site. Nothing below names a candidate or a party.

At the 45th general election (April 28, 2025) the riding had 82,102 electors on the list and 59,245 ballots were cast — a turnout of 72.16%.

Half of it happened before election day. 29,083 ballots — 49.09% of everything cast — were advance, mail or special ballots, which have no home polling division. Only 30,162 ballots (36.74% of electors) were cast at a polling division on election day itself. That is why a straight sum of the per-poll file produces 36.74% and not 72.16%: the two are different questions, not different answers to the same one, and every figure on this page says which one it is.

And the riding is not one place. Across polling divisions with at least 50 electors, election-day turnout runs from 22.22% (polling division 49, 378 electors) to 69.78% (polling division 401, 139 electors) — a 47.6 percentage-point spread inside a single riding, on a number that has nothing to do with which party anyone supports.

Sources: Elections Canada, poll-by-poll results and the 2025 polling-division boundary file, electoral district 35007, 45th general election (2025-04-28), Crown copyright; this project’s own reconciliation of advance, special and combined-poll rows. Electors cross-check exactly against Elections Canada’s own published elector count. Computed 2026-08-15; re-derived from the committed data at build time.

Election day, neighbourhood by neighbourhood

NeighbourhoodPollsElectorsElection-day ballotsElection-day turnout 20252021Change
Birchcliffe-Cliffside155317631.8%not in the 2021 riding
Taylor-Massey135,5851,89233.9%31.4%+2.5
The Beaches3716,3555,71634.9%37.5%-2.6
Danforth East York104,6861,64535.1%32.1%+3.0
Woodbine-Lumsden135,9612,15436.1%36.3%-0.2
O'Connor-Parkview2812,4674,57636.7%38.2%-1.5
Danforth41,94971736.8%31.4%+5.4
Woodbine Corridor209,6013,61437.6%35.6%+2.0
East End-Danforth3615,3806,14640.0%36.8%+3.2
Old East York31,27251240.3%28.9%+11.4
Victoria Village21,13846540.9%38.2%+2.7

A polling division is assigned to whichever neighbourhood contains its centroid, which is an approximation for a poll that straddles a line. Several neighbourhoods sit only partly inside the riding and pick up only the polls on this side of it — read the poll count before trusting a percentage. South Riverdale appears in the 2021 column of the source data at 37.9% and has no 2025 row: the 2023 redistribution moved it out of this riding. Birchcliffe-Cliffside is the mirror case — 2025 only, one poll. Source: Elections Canada poll-by-poll results 2021 and 2025, joined at the neighbourhood grain because polling-division numbers are not comparable across the boundary change; rebuilt 2026-08-16.

Total turnout, by advance-poll zone

The table above is election day only. The table below is everything — advance ballots included — at the coarser grain Elections Canada’s advance zones make possible, and it is the only place in this profile where a true total-turnout figure exists below the riding level. Read at that grain the riding runs from 55.9% to 75.7%: a 19.8-point gap between two parts of the same riding. And the share cast in advance moves with it: across these 15 zones the two correlate at r = +0.75, running from 35.7% to 54.2% of a zone’s ballots. The parts of the riding that vote least also vote early least — advance voting, which is supposed to widen access, currently widens the gap.

Advance zoneMainly coversElectorsTotal turnout (advance + election day)Share of its ballots cast in advance
608East End-Danforth (14); Taylor-Massey (1)5,91055.9%40.9%
603Taylor-Massey (12)4,94858.5%40.7%
602O'Connor-Parkview (11); Taylor-Massey (2)5,17858.7%36.7%
600O'Connor-Parkview (8); Victoria Village (3)4,97359.0%36.5%
604Taylor-Massey (7); Woodbine-Lumsden (5); East End-Danforth (2)5,70463.5%46.7%
610East End-Danforth (16)5,67966.1%35.7%
605Woodbine-Lumsden (6); Danforth East York (4); Old East York (2); Taylor-Massey (1)5,77466.4%46.7%
601O'Connor-Parkview (12); Old East York (1)5,01768.9%44.0%
607Woodbine Corridor (8); East End-Danforth (4); Danforth (1)5,39270.7%44.0%
614The Beaches (10); Birchcliffe-Cliffside (1)4,99271.4%51.7%
611Woodbine Corridor (11); The Beaches (1)5,77171.9%47.6%
612The Beaches (10); Woodbine Corridor (2)5,53973.4%51.0%
606Danforth East York (7); Woodbine-Lumsden (3); Danforth (3)5,83373.9%49.2%
613The Beaches (12)5,22975.0%54.2%
609East End-Danforth (9); The Beaches (4)5,39375.7%45.4%

Source: Elections Canada poll-by-poll results, 45th general election, electoral district 35007, aggregated to its own advance-poll zones, 2026-08-15. Where a total-turnout figure and an election-day figure appear near each other anywhere on this site, both carry the denominator they were computed on.

The towers

16 of the riding’s polling divisions are a single building each. Among the 14 of them with at least 100 electors, election-day turnout runs from 30.4% to 75.2% — the widest and most concentrated version of the same pattern. These are counted as polls, never as residents: nothing here is about any person who lives in any of these buildings, and no address, unit or name appears in any file behind this page.

Polling divisionNeighbourhoodAdvance zoneElectorsElection-day turnout
402O'Connor-Parkview601100.0%
403Taylor-Massey60387930.4%
409East End-Danforth60836131.3%
410East End-Danforth60841831.3%
405Taylor-Massey60384933.7%
404Taylor-Massey60347433.8%
411East End-Danforth60838633.9%
406Taylor-Massey60372135.2%
412East End-Danforth60821936.5%
407Taylor-Massey60366937.2%
400Victoria Village60040541.5%
414East End-Danforth60717650.6%
408Woodbine-Lumsden60519153.4%
415Woodbine Corridor60719864.6%
401O'Connor-Parkview60112975.2%
413East End-Danforth6080no electors on the list

Source: as above, filtered to polling divisions serving one building. Two rows are edge cases and are shown rather than quietly dropped: one carries 10 electors and one carries none at all. Institutional and mobile polls, which serve care facilities rather than a residential block, are counted separately and are not in this table.

A low row is not an apathetic neighbourhood. It is a polling division where fewer people cast a ballot at that poll on that day — not a verdict on the people who live there. A low-participation area in this riding is very often one where the practical cost of voting is higher: a recent move the voter list has not caught up with, a language gap at the door, a shift that does not allow an hour off, a lobby a canvasser cannot get into, or simply nobody who has ever explained what a voter information card is. That gap is the kind a neighbours’ network can lower and a campaign cannot — a campaign wants your vote; a neighbours’ network can just help you cast it, for whoever you choose. What the numbers do and do not support is set out under Who lives here, below.

What changed since 2021 — and the correction we had to publish

Comparing 2021 to 2025 in this riding is harder than it looks: the 2023 redistribution redrew the boundary and renumbered every polling division, so the two years are only comparable at the neighbourhood grain, and only after the merged polls of 2021 are folded onto the rows that actually received their electors. Done properly, the riding moved 35.8% → 36.8% on election day — +1.0 points across 10 neighbourhoods present in both years.

The row worth pausing on is Taylor-Massey, the riding’s tower core and its lowest-participating neighbourhood: +2.5 points. It neither fell further behind nor caught up. Whatever produced the riding’s small recovery since 2021, it did not happen there.

And the gap between the riding’s neighbourhoods narrowed. Across the 10 neighbourhoods measurable in both years, the distance between the highest-participating and the lowest-participating went from 9.3 points in 2021 to 7.0 points in 2025. The riding’s participation gap is real, it is large, and it did not get wider.

We published a wrong version of this, and this is the correction. An earlier build of our own data stories folded 2021’s merged polling divisions onto the wrong denominator. Three things followed from that one error: a neighbourhood that had left the riding was published at nearly double its true election-day rate; one neighbourhood’s change was published at more than twice its true size; and the headline claim — that the riding’s participation gap had widened — was the reverse of what the corrected data says. All three were found and fixed on 2026-08-16, the affected story was retitled and re-published at a new address with a redirect from the old one, and this generator now refuses to build at all if the corrected direction is ever reversed again. The figures on this page are the corrected ones. Nothing on this site should still describe that gap as growing; if you find something that does, it is wrong and we want to hear about it.

Why this section says 36.8% and the section above says 36.74%. They are the same ballots over two different lists of electors, and the difference is the point of the section above. The riding-wide 36.74% divides election-day ballots by every elector on the list — including the 29,083 who voted in advance, by mail or by special ballot and therefore have no home polling division. The 36.8% here divides the same ballots by the 74,947 electors actually attached to an ordinary polling division inside a mapped neighbourhood, which is the only basis on which 2021 and 2025 can be compared at all — and it is computed identically in both years. The two are a tenth of a point apart; neither is wrong, and neither is the other.

Sources: Elections Canada poll-by-poll results, electoral district 35007, 2021 (2013 representation order) and 2025 (2023 representation order), joined at neighbourhood grain; per-row boundary and fold notes travel with the published dataset. 2021 layer rebuilt 2026-08-16. Every figure in this section is recomputed from those files each time this page is generated.

Who lives here — and how that tracks participation

This is the census joined to the election returns, neighbourhood by neighbourhood: City of Toronto neighbourhood profiles (2021 census) against Elections Canada’s own poll-by-poll file. It is the single richest table this project holds on the riding, and it is the reason the participation numbers above are not a mystery.

NeighbourhoodPopulationRenter householdsHomes in 5+ storey apartmentsMedian household income (2020)Low income (LIM-AT)Recent immigrants (2016–21)Aged 65+Election-day turnout 2025Change since 2021
Taylor-Massey15,02566.3%75.8%$68,50017.8%12.9%11.6%33.9%+2.5
The Beaches21,51036.6%7.6%$116,0007.9%2.3%17.1%34.9%-2.6
Danforth East York17,06530.9%12.2%$101,0009.3%2.4%16.6%35.1%+3.0
Woodbine-Lumsden7,91533.6%17.6%$96,00010.0%3.7%16.1%36.1%-0.2
O'Connor-Parkview18,40554.2%31.5%$77,00013.6%7.1%16.8%36.7%-1.5
Danforth9,30536.7%10.1%$98,00010.3%1.8%17.8%36.8%+5.4
Woodbine Corridor12,20540.1%10.5%$97,00011.1%2.7%12.3%37.6%+2.0
East End-Danforth21,84045.4%23.6%$90,00011.9%3.5%13.7%40.0%+3.2
Old East York9,16034.2%13.7%$96,0008.3%3.4%18.2%40.3%+11.4

Population and household figures are for the whole City neighbourhood, not the part of it inside the riding — several of these neighbourhoods are cut by the riding boundary, so read the population column as context for the shares beside it rather than as a headcount of electors. Sources: City of Toronto Open Data, Neighbourhood Profiles (2021 census, Statistics Canada), Open Government Licence – Toronto; Elections Canada poll-by-poll results 2021 and 2025. Joined 2026-08-15, change column corrected 2026-08-16.

What correlates — and the warning that has to sit beside it

These are computed across the 9 neighbourhoods in the table directly above, on the election-day turnout column in that same table — not imported from anywhere, and not computed on a different set of rows than the one published here.

Against election-day turnoutCorrelation (r)Reads as
Households paying 30%+ of income on shelter-0.51moderate — more of it goes with lower turnout
Bengali spoken at home-0.46moderate — more of it goes with lower turnout
Recent immigrants (2016–21)-0.40weak — more of it goes with lower turnout
Homes in 5+ storey apartments-0.38weak — more of it goes with lower turnout
Low income (LIM-AT)-0.32weak — more of it goes with lower turnout
Renter households-0.27weak — more of it goes with lower turnout
Aged 65++0.16essentially no relationship in this sample
Median household income+0.07essentially no relationship in this sample
Nine neighbourhoods is not a finding, it is a hint. Correlation is not cause, and a sample this small cannot separate “renters vote less” from the dozen things that ride along with renter share in this particular riding — more recent movers than the voter list has caught up with, more households where the ballot arrives in a second language, more shift work, more lobbies a canvasser cannot get into, fewer polling places within a short walk. Every one of those raises the practical cost of casting a ballot without saying anything at all about whether anyone wants to. Read this table as a description of where the cost is highest, never as a description of who cares.

Languages spoken at home

The riding’s north-east third is not served by an English-only public conversation, and the census says so precisely.

NeighbourhoodBengaliTamilTagalogCantoneseUrduGreek
Danforth0.0%0.0%0.0%2.8%0.2%2.5%
Danforth East York0.0%0.3%1.0%2.6%0.2%4.4%
East End-Danforth0.8%0.1%0.7%1.1%0.9%0.2%
O'Connor-Parkview1.1%0.6%2.0%0.8%1.3%1.9%
Old East York0.3%0.0%1.6%0.8%0.0%3.5%
Taylor-Massey12.2%1.1%1.9%1.1%1.8%0.3%
The Beaches0.0%0.0%0.1%0.2%0.0%0.0%
Woodbine Corridor0.4%0.0%0.0%1.9%0.3%0.2%
Woodbine-Lumsden0.4%0.0%0.2%2.5%0.5%0.7%

Share of the neighbourhood’s population speaking that language most often at home. Source: City of Toronto Open Data, Neighbourhood Profiles (2021 census), OGL – Toronto, fetched 2026-08-15.

What a representative room would look like

Attendance is the wrong measure of a public meeting in a riding shaped like this one; representativeness is the right one. Population-weighted across the riding’s 109,937 residents, a room that actually looked like Beaches—East York would be:

DimensionThe ridingA room of 50A room of 150
Renter households45.3%23 people68 people
Aged 65+15.2%8 people23 people
Immigrants32.2%16 people48 people
Low income11.7%6 people18 people
Bengali spoken at home2.1%1 person3 people
Tenants paying 30%+ of income on rent39.2%20 people59 people

Source: City of Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles (2021 census), population-weighted across the ten neighbourhoods the riding covers, 2026-08-16. Counting this in a real room means counting a sheet on a wall that people place their own stickers on — never a form, never a name, never a record about an individual.

Where nobody is — the riding’s negative space

Almost every civic map published about a place shows what is there. This one shows what is not. We put a 120-metre grid over the riding, clipped it to land (the riding polygon runs out into Lake Ontario; 116 sample points over water were dropped rather than counted, which would have inflated the headline by a quarter), and measured every one of the 1,161 remaining points to the nearest community institution with a real, walkable address.

What this measures, and what it does not. It measures where our map has no door — not where people are underserved. A gap over a ravine or a rail corridor is geometry; a gap over apartment blocks is a finding, and the two are separated in the underlying data rather than averaged together. It is also worth quoting the denominator whenever this number is quoted: the walk measurement uses the 78 institutions with a real walkable location, while per-capita coverage rates use the 93 institutions inside the riding including those known only to a general area. Those are two different true answers to two different questions, and neither is the other.

The language supply gap

Of 99 community organisations checked at priority, 18 have evidence of operating in at least one of Bengali, Cantonese, Mandarin, Tagalog, Urdu or Greek — and every single one of them sits in one corridor, the stretch of the Danforth between Main Street and Victoria Park. Not one sits in The Beaches, O’Connor-Parkview, Woodbine Corridor, Woodbine-Lumsden, Danforth, Old East York or Victoria Village. A further 25 report some interpretation route without running a programme in the language themselves. The remainder are recorded as unknown, which is not the same as no.

Rooms you can actually get into

Of 23 bookable meeting rooms inside the riding, exactly 1 is verified end to end — street, to an accessible transit stop, to a step-free door, to a lift, to an accessible washroom on the same floor. It is in The Beaches, at the opposite end of the riding from the neighbourhoods with the least coverage and the most renters. This audit counts buildings, stops, rooms and provisions. It does not count disabled people, and this project holds no data about who in this riding is disabled.

Sources: OpenStreetMap (ODbL 1.0, © OpenStreetMap contributors) for land use and geocoding; City of Toronto Open Data — Neighbourhoods and Green Spaces (OGL – Toronto) for the land and parkland masks; TTC GTFS via Toronto Open Data for stop accessibility flags; this project’s own institution register. Computed 2026-08-15, access denominator corrected 2026-08-16.

How word travels here

This riding still runs on print, email and Facebook — in that order. There is no riding subreddit (re-confirmed against a 272-community census of Toronto subreddits), no neighbourhood Discord, no publicly joinable WhatsApp community, no local radio station, no riding-native video creator, and no independent local newsletter beyond the ones the institutions described below already publish themselves. What it has instead is a non-profit community newspaper that has published since 1972 and is still delivered riding-wide by volunteers, a dense archipelago of Facebook groups, and — running in parallel and barely touching either — a substantially separate Bengali-language media system anchored on the Danforth.

Three information ecosystems, which overlap far less than their geography suggests: the Beach and Upper Beaches system (English, older, homeowner-weighted, organised around that newspaper and the business-improvement-area accounts near it); the Danforth Village and East Danforth system (mixed, renter- and family-weighted, organised around an eighteen-year-old neighbourhood association with its own blog, newsletter, weekly farmers market and autumn arts fair); and the Bengali-language system in Crescent Town and Taylor-Massey (a Facebook-first digital weekly, two Bengali-language newspapers distributed through mosques and Danforth businesses, and Canada’s first 24-hour Bengali television channel). Cutting across all three is a parents’ network of some 3,700 members running fifty-plus playgroups a session across four neighbourhoods — the best-organised non-institutional network in the riding.

The rooms, measured

Every figure below was read off the group’s own public description page, logged out, on 2026-08-15 — these are public rooms, and nothing about their members was collected, inferred or stored.

RoomMembersNote
The riding’s largest general Facebook group32,865about 677 posts a month
The east-Danforth corridor group24,041strict local-only and no-fundraiser rules
The largest buy-and-sell group16,484the highest raw traffic in the riding, and a passive-reach surface rather than a conversation
The East York memory/identity group18,423explicit rule that political content must be neutral, factual and locally relevant
The riding’s Buy Nothing gift-economy group374the whole gift-economy layer, and it is tiny — roughly one eighty-eighth of the largest room, in a riding of over a hundred thousand people
The finding hiding in that last row. Independent verification of the riding’s organisations found that nobody is operating a general neighbour-to-neighbour mutual aid network in Beaches—East York in 2026. The measured size of the gift-economy layer is the same finding from a different direction. Both are published with their sources: see the referral directory, which lists the doors that do exist — in-riding, nearby and city-wide — each with its source and the date it was last verified.

Sources: each organisation’s and each group’s own public pages, read 2026-08-15; this project’s media register; a 272-community census of Toronto subreddits. Institutions and public roles only — no individual is named on this page, and the question of which channel reaches which household is not published.

What neighbours actually report to the City

Read this before you read a number. 311 measures who calls, not what is wrong. Whether a broken thing becomes a 311 record depends on knowing the service exists, believing it will work, having the English or the patience for the interpretation queue, having the tenure to feel entitled to complain, and living in a housing form where the complaint is yours to make rather than your building’s. A neighbourhood that calls less is not a neighbourhood with fewer problems — it is at least as likely to be the newer, poorer, more-renting, less-English one, whose problems go to a superintendent, a landlord, or nowhere. Read naively, this dataset says the wealthiest part of the riding is the part with the most going wrong. That reading is almost certainly backwards.

In the 2025 calendar year the riding filed 27,012 service requests — 247 per 1,000 residents against a citywide 179, an index of 1.38. The honest comparisons are the narrow ones, because they strip out the housing-form effect: a house on curbside collection has three bins and three separate chances to report a missed pickup, while a 300-unit tower has one bin and one superintendent who calls once, or never. On the public realm the riding runs 105 per 1,000 against 80 citywide; on the strictest cut of all — roads, sidewalks, snow and ice, delivered to a bungalow and a twenty-storey slab on identical terms — 50 against 39.

Source: City of Toronto Open Data, 311 Service Requests – Customer Initiated, 1 January – 31 December 2025 (the most recent complete calendar year), OGL – Toronto, fetched 2026-08-15. Aggregated to the ward and to street intersections only where at least five requests share one; no address-located request is ever mapped, and nothing about encampments, shelters or people sleeping outside appears in these outputs at any resolution.

Renting here, and what is proposed on this land

The riding holds 202 registered apartment buildings with 13,170 rental units between them on the City’s RentSafeTO register. Against that, the City’s development pipeline carries 14,266 proposed residential units: more housing is proposed in this riding than exists in its entire registered rental stock today.

A trap worth naming, because it is easy to fall into. The City publishes one row per street address inside a development application. The riding’s 514 rows collapse to 219 distinct applications. Counting rows instead of applications overstates the pipeline by roughly two and a third times, and that is exactly the mistake a quick read of the open data produces.

On building condition, 57 buildings show a declining trajectory on at least one signal — either a falling score within the pre-2023 inspection era, or a drop of fifteen or more percentile points in their standing among the riding’s own buildings across the 2023 rubric change. None flags on both. Raw scores are never compared across that rubric change anywhere in this work, because the two scales do not mean the same thing; only a building’s rank among its neighbours survives the change. Buildings and companies only — nothing here is about any tenant.

Two accessibility numbers that are routinely quoted as one. 68 of the 202 registered buildings (34%) report an entrance you can get through without steps. Inside them, 530 of the 13,170 registered homes (4.0%) are recorded as barrier-free. A ramp at the door is not an accessible home; the register is precise enough to show the difference, which also means the entrance figure is the more flattering of the two and the one most likely to be quoted alone.

Sources: City of Toronto Open Data — Apartment Building Registration and Apartment Building Evaluation (RentSafeTO), Development Pipeline, and Development Applications, all OGL – Toronto, fetched 2026-08-15, cut to this riding. No applicant name and no objector name appears in any file behind this section.

Things anyone here can use

Not research — just the public infrastructure of the riding, counted from the City’s own open data and clipped to the boundary: 33 poster columns and 33 poster boards where anything may legally be posted, 23 park washrooms, and 47 public drinking-water sources. The libraries and community and recreation centres inside the ward are listed under Local commons above, with addresses.

One date that matters more than it looks. The by-election is Monday, August 31, 2026. Toronto’s standard lease-turnover date is Tuesday, September 1. The vote lands on the last full day of the old address — so anyone moving that week votes where they used to live, or not at all, and a student leaving for an out-of-town university in late August may already be gone on election day while still being here for the advance polls of August 21–24. For that group the advance poll is not a convenience; it is the only poll. The riding holds 5,547 people aged 15–19 and 5,423 aged 20–24.

Sources: City of Toronto Open Data — Street Furniture (Poster Structure and Poster Board), Park Washroom Facilities, Parks Drinking Water Sources, OGL – Toronto, fetched 2026-08-15; Statistics Canada 2021 census via City neighbourhood profiles; Elections Canada’s published dates for electoral district 35007, checked 2026-08-15. Confirm any voting date or location at elections.ca or 1-800-463-6868 — if Elections Canada disagrees with this page, Elections Canada is right.

Get involved — from thirty seconds to a year

Everything on this page is published so that anyone who lives here can use it: there is no membership, no gate and nothing to belong to. If you want to do something with it, the doors below start at thirty seconds and stop wherever you like — every one of them is optional, every one of them is free to copy or fork, and none of them asks who you vote for.

This is a neighbours’ project rather than a campaign or an organization: it publishes tools, data and evidence, and leaves every decision to the person reading. Nothing here endorses a candidate or a party, and nothing here needs our permission to be used.

How we know this, and what it cannot tell you

Publishing the method is part of the work, not an appendix to it. Everything above is built from published open data, joined by scripts that live in this project’s repository, and every layer is rebuildable from nothing with a single command chain.

The datasets, and their licences

What this project refuses to do

Three counts of the same place, and why they differ

Three independent measures of how many people live here sit within 578 people of each other — half of one percent: Statistics Canada’s count for federal electoral district 35007 is 109,359, the City’s count for Ward 19 is 109,465, and this project’s own method — spreading census population over residential land only and clipping it to the riding boundary — gives 109,937. They differ because the federal riding and the city ward are not the same shape: they are drawn by different bodies under different rules and share their cardinal boundary streets without sharing a map. Where a figure on this page is a riding figure it says so; where it is a ward figure it says so. If you need to know which federal riding your own address is in, Elections Canada’s own lookup is the only answer that cannot go stale.

Our own defect record

This project keeps a register of what its own published work got wrong, and fixes it at the generator rather than in the rendered page. The 2026-08-16 pass found and corrected a 2021 merged-poll denominator error that had produced one badly inflated neighbourhood figure, one badly inflated change figure, a literal missing value served as part of a public download, and a headline claim pointing in the wrong direction. All four were fixed the same day and are described in full in the correction notice above. This generator now re-derives each of the affected figures from the source data every time it runs and refuses to write anything at all if one of them has moved.

What else is on your ballot

Every Toronto voter marks three races on October 26, 2026: this ward’s councillor (above), the citywide mayor, and one school trustee.

This ward’s trustee-crosswalk precision note: TDSB confirmed (Beach Metro, 2026-05-14: 'the former TDSB wards of Beaches-East York and Scarborough Southwest have now been joined into one electoral area called Ward 10'). TCDSB confirmed high-confidence (TCDSB's own board page names Ward11 'East York, Toronto'). Viamonde exact - note this ward is grouped into Viamonde's CENTRAL secteur, not NORD-EST, despite its East York geography; taken directly from the board's own official Annexe C, not inferred. MonAvenir not disambiguated.

What this page doesn’t cover yet

This ward’s research brief names these additional gaps, plainly, rather than guessing over them:

Receipts — where every figure on this page comes from

And for the riding-wide sections of this page — participation, the 2021–2025 change, who lives here, coverage, media, 311, housing and the things anyone can use:

This ward’s research-brief sources:

Per-candidate research notes, QA flags, and source-capture logs are kept in this project’s internal working files, not published here; every bio and every fact on this page is drawn from that work but the page itself states the fact, not the working notes behind it.

Found a mistake?

That’s the system working. Every figure on this page traces to a public source or a candidate’s own published material, cited in the Receipts section above; if one is wrong, out of date, or reads differently than the source supports, we want to know before anyone else repeats it. Send it to the corrections page — it takes thirty seconds, and every correction is published, dated, and left visible.